Podcast anything.

Any source. One RSS feed.

Blogs

X accounts

Hacker News

Podcasts

Any website

The Daily FMSummarizes & narrates

One RSS feed

Subscribe to ready-made pods

Grab any pod from the library with its RSS feed (no account needed!)

Combine pods into one feed

Merge many podcasts into your own custom pod to get them all in a single feed

Customize your own pod

Create a custom summary pod with your own sources

Sources can be the things you already follow:

Websites: any article, blog, or newsletter link
X: the latest posts from your favorite @handles
Hacker News: top stories and their comment threads
Podcasts: fresh-episode recaps of any show
State legislatures: weekly bill activity

Connect your AI agent

Connect it over MCP and it can build and run pods for you

Featured Pods

AI Daily

anthropicopenaideepmindblognewssimonwillison@karpathy@sama@AnthropicAI@swyx@levelsio@yoheinakajima@dair_ai@rowancheung@rasbt@bcherny@steipete

Combine these episodes into your pod

All episodes from this podcast will be fed into your own.

AI Daily November 4: Anthropic FlashProve Verifies AI Outputs as Claude Plugins Go EnterpriseHere is today's AI Daily for Wednesday November 4th. Anthropic yesterday introduced FlashProve, a research system for what it calls provable inference. The idea is to let a developer cryptographically verify that a particular AI response actually came from a specified model. Anthropic says FlashProve is built on established cryptographic techniques and is substantially more efficient than earlier approaches. This is still research, not a standard product feature, but it addresses a growing problem: as AI moves into high-stakes workflows, organizations may need evidence of which model produced an output, rather than simply trusting an API log or a vendor’s claim. Provenance could matter for regulated work, model evaluation, auditing, and disputes over whether a response was generated by an approved system. Also yesterday, Anthropic expanded enterprise administration for Claude plugins. Team and Enterprise administrators can now configure company plugins centrally, and employees will be automatically connected the first time they use them. It sounds like a modest convenience feature, but it is an important step toward AI becoming embedded in everyday business systems. The barrier is shifting from “can the model do this task?” to “can it securely reach the right company data and tools, with the right permissions?” Centralized setup reduces friction, but raises the stakes for identity management, least-privilege access, and careful review of what each connected tool can do. A striking technical experiment came from Simon Willison yesterday. He tested recent research suggesting language models can interpret and modify the numerical weights of neural networks directly. Willison reports that Qwen 3.8 27B, running locally on his laptop, could reproduce one of the demonstrations. The finding is early and experimental, but potentially significant: models may increasingly help inspect, patch, or repurpose other models at the weight level, rather than only writing code around them. That could open new tools for model analysis and compression, while making validation even more important. The broader trend is a move from AI as a chat interface toward AI as infrastructure: connected to enterprise systems, capable of manipulating software and models, and increasingly expected to produce verifiable records of what it did. Faster capability makes trust, permissions, and independent checks more valuable—not less. Thank you for listening to AI Daily from The Daily FM. See you tomorrow!

Latent Space in 3 minutes

feed:api.substack.com

Combine these episodes into your pod

All episodes from this podcast will be fed into your own.

Latent Space in 3 minutes: ⚡ Behind Latent Space: A Rare Look Inside the Pod | AIEi ShanghaiHere is The Daily FM summary of the Latent Space that aired on Wednesday November 4th. This special episode, recorded around the first AI Engineer conference in Shanghai, was both a look at China’s AI ecosystem and a personal retrospective from Latent Space founder Shawn “swyx” Wang on how he built the podcast, the AI Engineer movement, and a portfolio-style career across media, conferences, advising, and startups. Wang began by stressing that he did not bring AIE to Shanghai alone: local organizers and partners made it happen. His broader goal is to create more exchange between Chinese and Western AI communities, especially around China’s progress in open models, robotics, developer communities, and startup execution. He praised longtime Chinese fans and translators, particularly Meng Xiao, who has helped make Latent Space accessible to Chinese audiences. The origin story of Latent Space centered on “learning in public.” Wang contrasted finance, which he called a zero-sum culture of secrecy, with technology, where sharing code, failures, and discoveries can create more value for everyone. After Stable Diffusion’s release, he used a struggling period at a startup as an opportunity to study AI openly through writing. That ultimately led to the podcast. His advice was encouraging but unsentimental: credentials are not the only route into a new field, but hard work alone does not entitle anyone to success. People must work on meaningful problems and get genuinely good. That learning process also led to the term “AI engineer.” Wang said the point was to recognize software engineers who build practical systems around models—what he now calls harnesses—rather than treating AI as valuable only when it involves elite model research. The role has broadened into areas such as evaluations, agents, memory, multimodality, and AI architecture, but its core has not changed: an AI engineer is the person accountable when an AI-powered system breaks at 4 a.m. He pushed back on AI conferences dominated by executives predicting imminent AGI, arguing that working engineers need more space to share real implementation failures and lessons. AIE itself is meant to be the flagship gathering for that community, like GDC for game developers or KubeCon for cloud engineers. Wang highlighted that the organization transcribes its talks, profiles speakers, and publishes data and MCP-accessible material so the conference becomes a searchable learning resource rather than a one-time event. Its international expansion follows a franchise-like model: local teams run AIE events while sharing a brand, publishing content, and following a code of conduct. Shanghai is especially complicated because of U.S.-China restrictions, so local ownership matters. The most provocative discussion concerned Wang’s “Kill My SaaS” experiment. Faced with a proposed $40,000 software subscription, he offered a $10,000 prize to clone it as customizable open-source software. Dozens of submissions arrived, several usable within a week. His argument was that mid-market SaaS companies are vulnerable as coding agents can replicate workflows and let businesses tailor their own tools. He has already built personal alternatives to services resembling Calendly, Dropbox, GitHub, Slack, and DocuSign. Still, he acknowledged self-hosted tools carry maintenance costs; the tradeoff makes most sense where customization beats enterprise-grade reliability. He also praised TypeSafe’s “Jev” as a different model for AI software: rather than putting one giant chatbot at the edge of an application, use small, fast System 1-style models throughout code paths to make many local decisions reliably. The episode ended with admiration for China’s scale, work ethic, and builder energy, alongside a warning that AI’s biggest risks may go beyond job loss or misinformation toward cyber and biological threats. Wang’s blunt framing: humanity must take seriously the possibility that systems advancing far faster than humans could become dangerously more capable. Thank you for listening to Latent Space in 3 minutes from The Daily FM. See you next time!

View the whole library →

Subscribe to one of these pods with the RSS feed, or create your own →